-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider additional featureType enumerated values #401
Comments
This issue was discussed in the Maintenance Iteration call. The following considerations were discussed:
|
Westpac suggests the following descriptions for the proposed enumerated values:
We suggest that DSB and the community consider whether RELATIONSHIP_MANAGEMENT makes sense to include as a feature – RELATIONSHIP_MANAGEMENT is usually advertised as a separate service. |
These changes have been staged for review: ConsumerDataStandardsAustralia/standards-staging@release/1.15.0...maintenance/401 |
This change was incorporated into release v1.15.0. Refer to Decision 212 for further details. |
Description
There are product features commonly listed by data holders under the enumerated value of OTHER. We suggest adding additional enumerated values as this will help to make the data between data holders more consistent. We recommend that this issue only be prioritised if there is data recipient demand. Example additional enumerated values that may be considered include:
Area Affected
Change Proposed
Add additional enumerated values based on common use of the OTHER feature type, expected scope of features to be included in responses and desirability for data recipients.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: