Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consent API and definition #47

Closed
NationalAustraliaBank opened this issue Dec 20, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Consent API and definition #47

NationalAustraliaBank opened this issue Dec 20, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
feedback A general placeholder for feedback. response provided A response has been provided and the issue will be closed in no further feedback is provided

Comments

@NationalAustraliaBank
Copy link

NAB is concerned with the lack of definition for consent management, including:

·        Create, view and revoke consents APIs
·        Data structures and claims made within the consent requests
·        Notification that consent has been revoked endpoints (called by DH to DR). This is done to notify the DR that consent has been revoked; that API calls for this customers’ data should cease; and that currently held data for that customer should be discarded safely.
 
The consent management process appears to have overlapping concerns with the UX, Security and Data Standards streams. Without clear guidelines at this stage this is likely to impact the July 2019 rollout.

@lukepopp lukepopp added the feedback A general placeholder for feedback. label Dec 21, 2018
@lukepopp
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @NationalAustraliaBank

@dpostnikov
Copy link

UK reference could be used as a possible starting point?

https://openbanking.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DZ/pages/937558092/Account+Access+Consents+v3.1

@JamesMBligh
Copy link
Contributor

The current position, based on CX testing results and a review of the ACCC draft rules, is that low level permissions are not required. As a result v1 of the standards will be limited to OIDC scopes rendering a consent API unnecessary. If the regime requires this at a later date this decision may be revisited.

Note that the the implication of this position are as follows:

  • There will be no consent API in v1 to construct a low resolution model of consent
  • There will be no consent APIs to modify consent post authorisation. Consent will be considered immutable until a revocation or reauthorisation event occurs
  • There will be no ability to programatically retrieve consent for an authorisation once the authorisation flows is completed. A customer will still be able to see this via their dashboards
  • Consent is not a shareable data set
  • A mechanism for revocation and bi-directional notification will be created

-JB-

@JamesMBligh JamesMBligh added the response provided A response has been provided and the issue will be closed in no further feedback is provided label Apr 3, 2019
@JamesMBligh JamesMBligh mentioned this issue Apr 3, 2019
@ConsumerDataStandardsAustralia ConsumerDataStandardsAustralia locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
feedback A general placeholder for feedback. response provided A response has been provided and the issue will be closed in no further feedback is provided
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants