GPL

[lhk]

Hi,

I'm afraid I don't like the GPL license.
At some point the devices are supposed to be actually built.
Maybe someone isn't there when we do this.
Then he could probably buy one of the weapons at the price of the materials.
Makes sense to flash the software before selling the device and booom: problems with GPL.

I propose something more liberal. What about MIT ?

Since so far all code has been written by me, I'm allowing myself to apply that license to the repo.
If you want a more restrictive license for further development, we can figure it out.

[ghost]

@Mitmischer and me figured out that 'Patent Use ' is a discussionpoint - check this out: http://choosealicense.com/licenses

Our suggestion Apache License 2.0

[lhk]

What is patent use ?

[lhk]

Apache looks good.