Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: Call getVm(vmId, userId) Function #34

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 18, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Bug: Call getVm(vmId, userId) Function #34

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 18, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. In some pieces of code which call getVm(vmId, userId) assign false parameter 
as getVm(userId, vmId) which must flip the parameter to getVm(vmId, userId).

The mistake in:
*Class Datacenter:
    |processCloudletStatus(SimEvent ev) (1 statement)
    |processCloudletStatus(SimEvent ev) (1 statement)
    |processCloudletMove(int[] receivedData, int type) (2 statements)
    |processCloudletResume(int cloudletId, int userId, int vmId, boolean ack) (1 statement)
    |processCloudletPause(int cloudletId, int userId, int vmId, boolean ack) (1 statement)
    |processCloudletCancel(int cloudletId, int userId, int vmId) (1)


What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
getVm(vmId, userId)

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Cloudsim 3.0, Mac OSX, Netbeanse 7.0, Ant 1.8.

Please provide any additional information below.


Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 5 Jul 2012 at 3:51

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This issue was closed by revision r170.

Original comment by rodrigo.calheiros on 3 Aug 2012 at 6:17

  • Changed state: Fixed

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

This bug was confirmed, and fixed on Rev. 170.

Original comment by rodrigo.calheiros on 3 Aug 2012 at 6:18

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant