Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

update contract state #25

Closed
3 tasks
ixje opened this issue Aug 6, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks

update contract state #25

ixje opened this issue Aug 6, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@ixje
Copy link
Member

ixje commented Aug 6, 2020

@ixje ixje added the parity label Aug 6, 2020
@ixje
Copy link
Member Author

ixje commented Aug 10, 2020

We can actually skip this and consider if it is worth it later, it is an optimization for database size (storing an ID instead of UInt160 as part of the key lookup).

  • One thing to consider is how it affects raw storage put/get calls. Will it actually be easier to make mistakes by using just an id or not?

@ixje ixje added enhancement and removed parity labels Aug 10, 2020
@ixje
Copy link
Member Author

ixje commented Apr 7, 2021

no longer applicable

@ixje ixje closed this as completed Apr 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ixje