Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Edge directions and merging citing' and cited-by' #11

Open
pesho-ivanov opened this issue Mar 3, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Edge directions and merging citing' and cited-by' #11

pesho-ivanov opened this issue Mar 3, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@pesho-ivanov
Copy link

The two views (papers citing and cited by the seeds) can naturally be visualized together. Such a view will not only show more relevant information but will also simplify the user interaction by skipping the choice.

Any (or both) of these two approaches can be used to distinguish the citing from the cited by nodes:

  1. Adding direction to the edges (which will also allow for clean semantics for non-seed dependence Pagination of title search results #17)
  2. DAG'ifying the graph (as cycles are possible) and plotting it left-to-right or top-to-bottom.
@barney-walker barney-walker transferred this issue from CitationGecko/citation-network-explorer Jul 5, 2019
@barney-walker
Copy link
Collaborator

I think option 2 is the more natural solution.

Related ticket: #31

@no-identd
Copy link

I agree with the DAGification as the better option, but I'd also like to add a note:
If you do end up adding directed edges of some form, there's UX research (I can dig up the citations IFF you insist.) showing that tapering edges (thick at the start, thin at the end) function as much better visual indicators of direction than arrows do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants