You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I don't want these annotations, as I intend to use bean-validation annotations instead. These additional annotations just clutter the record classes.
Describe the solution you'd like
Extract the annotations to a separate .mustache-file, so that I can opt-out of using these annotations.
Describe alternatives you've considered
None.
Additional context
This would be backwards-compatible, right?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So, alternatively, when #50 is enabled (=true), these annotations should be replaced? Not sure what value there is to have "redundant" annotations like this?
Voice your opinion
Via the poll #202
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I don't want these annotations, as I intend to use bean-validation annotations instead. These additional annotations just clutter the record classes.
Describe the solution you'd like
Extract the annotations to a separate
.mustache
-file, so that I can opt-out of using these annotations.Describe alternatives you've considered
None.
Additional context
This would be backwards-compatible, right?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: