Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Messages for impedance commands #84

Open
marcoesposito1988 opened this issue Jan 12, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Messages for impedance commands #84

marcoesposito1988 opened this issue Jan 12, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@marcoesposito1988
Copy link
Collaborator

As suggested by @gavanderhoorn in IFL-CAMP/iiwa_stack#42, it would probably be a good idea to work on common messages for impedance commands.

There is a starting point at https://github.com/ros-industrial-consortium/majorana (it was a GSoC but it is already over). Shall we both start a branch, and see where it goes from there? I think getting our hands dirty would be the only way to realize real problems with it.

@carlosjoserg
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, I'm aware of that project too... sure, it sounds clever to work all together in common messages for impedance commands

Do you know of any robot already using them? Or so far it's been what would be ideal to have?

Do you know what was wrong with https://github.com/RCPRG-ros-pkg/cartesian_trajectory_msgs ?

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link

Perhaps @rkojcev can provide some background.

@rkojcev
Copy link

rkojcev commented Jan 16, 2017

Hi all,

I have tested the set of messages with the kuka iiwa. The driver that interfaces between ROS and the Sunrise OS was the grl.

The goal of the development was to come up with of generalized set of msgs for Impedance/Force control that are robot agnostic.

It would be great if we get some feedback/improvements and more robots using the cartesian impedance messages. Let me know if you need any more info.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants