Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Constant-rate features vs variable-rate labels #13

Open
cveaux opened this issue Jul 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Constant-rate features vs variable-rate labels #13

cveaux opened this issue Jul 26, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@cveaux
Copy link

cveaux commented Jul 26, 2018

Hi Felipe,

I've being comparing the quality of Magphase copy-synthesis (low-dim) on a female voice depending on the value of b_const_rate. (I used mag_dim=60 and phase_dim=45). It seemed to me that the constant rate version has a little more buzziness but I somehow found it preferable to the pitch-synchronous version which is kind of noisy sometimes. (It looks as if the interpolation was filtering the noise albeit a bit too much). Does this match your observations?

Also, I have a question regarding the training with Merlin. Is it preferable to use the constant-rate version (b_const_rate = 1) or to use pitch-synchronous features and warp the labels (b_conv_labs_rate = 1)?

Thanks!

@ZhaoZeqing
Copy link

Hi Veaux,

I have a question about the frame rate. What does constant or variable frame rate mean?
I'm not sure the following which is what I understand is right.

This is a phone and it's duration:
2000000 2500000 phone

If it is constant frame rate, each state's duration is equal, like this:
2000000 2100000 state
2100000 2200000 state
2200000 2300000 state
2300000 2400000 state
2400000 2500000 state

If it is variable frame rate, each state's duration may be not equal, like this:
2000000 2150000 state
2150000 2200000 state
2200000 2360000 state
2360000 2435000 state
2435000 2500000 state

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants