You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the 1deg setup of MOM6, Leith nonlinear eddy viscosity was employed instead of the Smagorinsky eddy viscosity used in MOM5. Any reasons behind why this decision was made? The relevant Leith parameters are listed below,
631 AH = 1000000000000.0 (not sure)
632 ! "[m4 s-1] default = 0.0
633 ! The background biharmonic horizontal viscosity."
634
635 AH_VEL_SCALE = 0.0 (not sure)
636 ! "[m s-1] default = 0.0
637 ! The velocity scale which is multiplied by the cube of
638 ! the grid spacing to calculate the biharmonic viscosity.
639 ! The final viscosity is the largest of this scaled
640 ! viscosity, the Smagorinsky and Leith viscosities, and AH."
641
642 LEITH_AH = True (not sure)
643 ! "[Boolean] default = False
644 ! If true, use a biharmonic Leith nonlinear eddy viscosity."
645
646 LEITH_BI_CONST = 128.0 (not sure)
647 ! "[nondim] default = 0.0
648 ! The nondimensional biharmonic Leith constant, typical values are thus far
649 ! undetermined."
650
SMAG_BI_CONST = 0.06
! "[nondim] default = 0.0
! The nondimensional biharmonic Smagorinsky constant,
! typically 0.015 - 0.06."
SMAGORINSKY_KH = True
! [Boolean] default = False
! If true, use a Smagorinsky nonlinear eddy viscosity.
SMAG_LAP_CONST = 0.15
! [nondim] default = 0.0
! The nondimensional Laplacian Smagorinsky constant, often 0.15.
AH_VEL_SCALE = 0.01 (both 1deg and 0.25deg)
! [m s-1] default = 0.0
! The velocity scale which is multiplied by the cube of the grid spacing to calculate the biharmonic viscosity. The final viscosity is the largest of this scaled viscosity, the Smagorinsky and Leith viscosities, and AH.
KH_VEL_SCALE = 0.01 - 1deg / 0.0 - 0.25deg
! [m s-1] default = 0.0
! The velocity scale which is multiplied by the grid spacing to calculate the
! Laplacian viscosity. The final viscosity is the largest of this scaled
! viscosity, the Smagorinsky and Leith viscosities, and KH.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
All the parameters were inherited from the CESM GMOM_JRA configuration this was based on, so I don't know the reasons for these choices. We should feel free to modify these.
Our other MOM6 configurations use Smagorinsky biharmonic (smagorinsky_ah) rather than Leith biharmonic (leith_ah) - see this table. ACCESS-OM2 used isotropic biharmonic Smagorinsky - see section 3.2.5 of the tech report.
In the 1deg setup of MOM6, Leith nonlinear eddy viscosity was employed instead of the Smagorinsky eddy viscosity used in MOM5. Any reasons behind why this decision was made? The relevant Leith parameters are listed below,
Parameters associated with Smagorinsky eddy viscosity are provided for reference, with the reference given in paper The GFDL Global Ocean and Sea Ice Model OM4.0: Model Description and Simulation Features,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: