Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Algebraic_foundations: unknown group in documentation #7788

Closed
albert-github opened this issue Oct 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7804
Closed

Algebraic_foundations: unknown group in documentation #7788

albert-github opened this issue Oct 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7804

Comments

@albert-github
Copy link
Contributor

Analogous to the issues #7691, #7692 and #7693 adding a warning to doxygen gives me the warning

Algebraic_foundations/doc/Algebraic_foundations/Concepts/ExplicitInteroperable.h:26: warning: Found non-existing group 'PkgAlgebraicFoundationsInteroperabilityConcepts' for the command '@ingroup', ignoring comm
and
Algebraic_foundations/doc/Algebraic_foundations/Concepts/Fraction.h:16: warning: Found non-existing group 'PkgAlgebraicFoundationsFractionsConcepts' for the command '@ingroup', ignoring command
Algebraic_foundations/doc/Algebraic_foundations/Concepts/FromDoubleConstructible.h:14: warning: Found non-existing group 'PkgAlgebraicFoundationsConcepts' for the command '@ingroup', ignoring command
Algebraic_foundations/doc/Algebraic_foundations/Concepts/FromIntConstructible.h:17: warning: Found non-existing group 'PkgAlgebraicFoundationsConcepts' for the command '@ingroup', ignoring command
Algebraic_foundations/doc/Algebraic_foundations/Concepts/ImplicitInteroperable.h:28: warning: Found non-existing group 'PkgAlgebraicFoundationsInteroperabilityConcepts' for the command '@ingroup', ignoring command
  • where do these \ingroup belong to or should the lines be removed?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants