-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
UrsaDB process gets killed on big set of files #222
Comments
UPD: process of indexing batch files with utils.index also gets killed in UrsaDB. |
Sorry for not responding to this issue earlier. I didn't know how to reproduce it (and forgot about it later), but that's not an excuse for ignoring it. I was also not active in this project for some time. Some thoughts:
I realise it's probably not important for you anymore. In this case, if the problem turns out to be non-reproducible, I think I'll have to close the issue unresolved. |
But you can make it work by limitting ursadb a bit. See https://cert-polska.github.io/ursadb/limits.html As documented, you can make merging work with 4GB of RAM by tweaking If you still have problems with it, please create an issue in https://github.com/CERT-Polska/ursadb repository |
Environment information
Reproduction Steps
I have successfully installed mquery on bare-metal machine with the following config:
OS: Ubuntu 18.04
CPU: 4 cores, 8 threads
RAM: 4GB
Storage: ~1TB
It works fine and smooth on small sets of files, but I tried to test it on ~16.000 PE samples (~25GB) and after some time UrsaDB process gets killed (I will attach a screenshot below).
Expected behaviour
Mquery successfully indexes 25GB set of samples and allows to run queries on it.
Actual behaviour the bug
UrsaDB process gets killed some time after pressing "reindex" button, so it is impossible to index such set of samples.
Screenshots
Additional context
Maybe the problem is with the configuration of a machine itself (not enough RAM, etc.), then I would be grateful if you could point at possible issue here, or provide minimal requirements for proper work of mquery.
I have also read about utils.index method and will test it, but it would be great to use the standard way of reindexing though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: