Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unifying work with OnApp/squall repo #63

Open
tombh opened this issue Feb 10, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Unifying work with OnApp/squall repo #63

tombh opened this issue Feb 10, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@tombh
Copy link

tombh commented Feb 10, 2015

Hi there,

Thanks for the great work on this repo.

We at Onapp are depending more heavily on this library for one of our products. So I'm starting to look at introducing some semantic versioning (see virtuozzo#1). I'm just wondering where you're at with this repo? I notice we're out of sync with each other, there are changes we need to pull and there a changes you could pull. Can we work together somehow?

Thanks,
tom :)

@jmazzi
Copy link
Contributor

jmazzi commented Feb 17, 2015

@tombh sorry we're getting back to you so late. Sure, we would be happy to help

@tombh
Copy link
Author

tombh commented Feb 24, 2015

Great, the main I think is that there's one canonical repo. Would you be up for making me a contributor? Or we could become the main repo and make you contributors?

@jmazzi
Copy link
Contributor

jmazzi commented Mar 2, 2015

@tombh would you mind if we took this to email? Should I use the email on your profile?

@tombh
Copy link
Author

tombh commented Mar 3, 2015

Sure, use my onapp.com domain one, thomas@

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants