-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Poor mapping results #10
Comments
Hello, could you please share tour dataset? |
Thanks for the quick reply! I am afraid that I have to get permission first since it belongs to a company. But I have another (but smaller) dataset using the same camera which also produces poor results: while it should look like this (plan view): here's the link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/12RDvl_CIJ5Sp7gj4SJ8cZlnDEBBxzY8l/view?usp=sharing |
Is it possible to have it in a rosbag format or as an image sequence please? I am not using the ZED SDK. |
I don't have the image sequence, but I could convert it into a rosbag. here's the link (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Esdr9omV36d5xvqmLRwGRKe97LwPFTZ5/view?usp=sharing) If you use this package (https://github.com/stereolabs/zed-ros-wrapper) it'd be faster from your side to convert rather than downloading it: |
Hello,
I am using the supersurfel_fusion for mapping, with a zed-mini camera dataset.
For that, I had to make some modifications in
supersufel_fusion.cu
,ferns.cu
andTPS_RGBD.cu
because of the (RGB to RGBA) and (RGB to GRAY) conversions.(If there is already a unique way to handle this, please tell me about it)
After all, the problem is that I get very poor results, for instance, this map:
Which is supposed to be something like this:
Could it be due to poor parameter tuning? Please help me, how to get better results?
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: