Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

develop branch #168

Closed
rocketman768 opened this issue Feb 7, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

develop branch #168

rocketman768 opened this issue Feb 7, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@rocketman768
Copy link
Member

@Brewtarget/developers

Over the last few months, we've been moving to the standard git branching model. As one of the final parts of the process, I created and made the 'develop' branch the default branch. All you need to do is treat it exactly the same way we have been treating the 'master' branch. Please base all your new features on it, and create pull requests against it.

On and after the 2.4.0 release this summer, the 'master' branch will be used to track releases only.

Thank you!

@theophae
Copy link
Contributor

Do you plane to move to continuous integration process with automatic merge into develop branch based on Travis result ?
About Travis tools, it could be a good idea to make it execute brewtarget_tests automatically for every pull request ?

I've also read some interesting things about fast-forwarding in git. Base on that, I think we could avoid squashing commits systematically for the pull request and use --no-ff option for git merge instead. What do you think about this ?

@rocketman768
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, I'd like to execute brewtarget_tests as part of the travis builds. If you know how, submit a pull request.

I would not like to do any automatic merging for now.

But, I would really REALLY like automatic packaging for:

  • debian/stable (x86, amd64)
  • debian/unstable (x86, amd64)
  • fedora (x86, amd64)
  • suse (x86, amd64)
  • Windows (x86)
  • Mac (amd64)

@theophae
Copy link
Contributor

About the tests, it looks like you just need to had the test run just after the build as explained here

@Brewtarget Brewtarget locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 9, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants