Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interface command resurrection! On a circuit level #98

Open
parkeraa opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Interface command resurrection! On a circuit level #98

parkeraa opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@parkeraa
Copy link
Contributor

parkeraa commented Aug 18, 2023

In a previous version, there existed an interface command, which took in 2 components and connected ports on those components which had the same name. This command is similar to spice's functionality of naming nodes, etc, and them being automatically connected. This interface command could be especially useful at a circuit level, or with large subcircuits/components. In the case of connecting large components, the ports on each component could be named to make the connections easier to keep track of or understand. It is similar to the way a list of ports can all be connected at once, but the user doesn't have to make the list themself. A more extreme (and potentially useful) version relies on being able to add components to a circuit without connecting them (see other issue). In this case, a large component or a large number of components could be added to the circuit with the ports named appropriately, and the interface command would search through all the components in the circuit and connect all ports with the same name. This way, naming ports could replace having to explicitly connect them.

@parkeraa parkeraa added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 18, 2023
@sequoiap
Copy link
Collaborator

Decision: We will create a function called autoconnect().

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants