Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Maximum Likelihood Tomo #63

Open
matthewware opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Maximum Likelihood Tomo #63

matthewware opened this issue Apr 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@matthewware

Comments

@matthewware
Copy link
Collaborator

MLTomo requires the observables to be POVMS. If we're hacking in Hermeticity,, we should try to do the same for other requirements in MLTomo: positive-semidefinite and trace >1.

There are currently no checks in Qlab.jl for these conditions or ways to pick the closest CPTP obs.
@matthewware matthewware self-assigned this Apr 17, 2020
@matthewware matthewware changed the title Maximum-Likelyhood Tomo Maximum Likelihood Tomo Apr 17, 2020
@matthewware
Copy link
Collaborator Author

So we currently build the effects from the cal data. Not sure this is the best way to go about it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@matthewware matthewware

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@matthewware