Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Urgent] Release new version SDK for feature BackupShortTermRetentionPolicy introduced a new parameter DiffBackupIntervalnHours plus ReplicationLink changes. #21761

Conversation

lululilliancoding
Copy link
Contributor

@lululilliancoding lululilliancoding commented Jun 10, 2021

All SDK Contribution checklist:

Swagger change: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#14671

This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

  • Please open PR in Draft mode if it is:
    • Work in progress or not intended to be merged.
    • Encountering multiple pipeline failures and working on fixes.
  • If an SDK is being regenerated based on a new swagger spec, a link to the pull request containing these swagger spec changes has been included above.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.
  • The pull request does not introduce breaking changes.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

SDK Generation Guidelines

  • The generate.cmd file for the SDK has been updated with the version of AutoRest, as well as the commitid of your swagger spec or link to the swagger spec, used to generate the code. (Track 2 only)
  • The *.csproj and AssemblyInfo.cs files have been updated with the new version of the SDK. Please double check nuget.org current release version.

Additional management plane SDK specific contribution checklist:

Note: Only applies to Microsoft.Azure.Management.[RP] or Azure.ResourceManager.[RP]

  • Include updated management metadata.
  • Update AzureRP.props to add/remove version info to maintain up to date API versions.

Management plane SDK Troubleshooting

  • If this is very first SDK for a services and you are adding new service folders directly under /SDK, please add new service label and/or contact assigned reviewer.

  • If the check fails at the Verify Code Generation step, please ensure:

    • Do not modify any code in generated folders.
    • Do not selectively include/remove generated files in the PR.
    • Do use generate.ps1/cmd to generate this PR instead of calling autorest directly.
      Please pay attention to the @microsoft.csharp version output after running generate.ps1. If it is lower than current released version (2.3.82), please run it again as it should pull down the latest version.

    Note: We have recently updated the PSH module called by generate.ps1 to emit additional data. This would help reduce/eliminate the Code Verification check error. Please run following command:

      `dotnet msbuild eng/mgmt.proj /t:Util /p:UtilityName=InstallPsModules`
    

Old outstanding PR cleanup

Please note:
If PRs (including draft) has been out for more than 60 days and there are no responses from our query or followups, they will be closed to maintain a concise list for our reviewers.

@check-enforcer
Copy link

This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer.

What is Check Enforcer?

Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass.

Why am I getting this message?

You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged.

What should I do now?

If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows:
/check-enforcer evaluate
Typically evaulation only takes a few seconds. If you know that your pull request is not covered by a pipeline and this is expected you can override Check Enforcer using the following command:
/check-enforcer override
Note that using the override command triggers alerts so that follow-up investigations can occur (PRs still need to be approved as normal).

What if I am onboarding a new service?

Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them. In order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, please perform following steps:

For data-plane/track 2 SDKs Issue the following command as a pull request comment:

/azp run prepare-pipelines
This will run a pipeline that analyzes the source tree and creates the pipelines necessary to build and validate your pull request. Once the pipeline has been created you can trigger the pipeline using the following comment:
/azp run net - [service] - ci

For track 1 management-plane SDKs

Please open a separate PR and to your service SDK path in this file. Once that PR has been merged, you can re-run the pipeline to trigger the verification.

@lululilliancoding lululilliancoding changed the title draft PR Release new version SDK for feature BackupShortTermRetentionPolicy introduced a new parameter DiffBackupIntervalnHours. Jun 17, 2021
@lululilliancoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/check-enforcer evaluate

@lululilliancoding lululilliancoding changed the title Release new version SDK for feature BackupShortTermRetentionPolicy introduced a new parameter DiffBackupIntervalnHours. Release new version SDK for feature BackupShortTermRetentionPolicy introduced a new parameter DiffBackupIntervalnHours plus ReplicationLink changes. Jun 18, 2021
@lululilliancoding lululilliancoding changed the title Release new version SDK for feature BackupShortTermRetentionPolicy introduced a new parameter DiffBackupIntervalnHours plus ReplicationLink changes. [Urgent] Release new version SDK for feature BackupShortTermRetentionPolicy introduced a new parameter DiffBackupIntervalnHours plus ReplicationLink changes. Jun 22, 2021
@lululilliancoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

lululilliancoding commented Jun 22, 2021

With Autorest CSharp > 2.3.82 in the metadata file, no extra unexpected changes and not touch generated folder -> #22049

@allenjzhang allenjzhang added the SQL label Jul 7, 2021
@allenjzhang
Copy link
Member

/azp run net - mgmt - ci

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Pull request contains merge conflicts.

azure-sdk pushed a commit to azure-sdk/azure-sdk-for-net that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
Machinelearningservices microsoft.machine learning services 2022 12 01 preview (Azure#21761)

* Adds base for updating Microsoft.MachineLearningServices from version preview/2022-10-01-preview to version 2022-12-01-preview

* Updates readme

* Updates API version in new specs and examples

* Add Dec API Registries Swagger (Azure#21419)

* add december registries swagger + examples

* add status code 202 in examples

* fix 202 examples

* fixes

* fixes

* fix

* add 202 back in for put/patch

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <[email protected]>

* remove location (Azure#21430)

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <[email protected]>

* remove readonly flag on schedules property for CI (Azure#21653)

Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <[email protected]>

* add missing workspace properties (Azure#21725)

* December preview updating mfe.json specs (Azure#21510)

* December preview updating mfe.json specs

* MFE Dec 2022 Preview API - Adding logbase

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation fix

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation fix, add missing location

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - typo fix

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix api version in automljob example

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix for multiselectenabled error

* MFE 2022-12-01-preview swagger spec model validation - fix for multiselectenabled error

* Fix  for 1006 - RemovedDefinition (RecurrenceTrigger,CronTrigger) (Azure#21822)

* fix ReadonlyPropertyChanged of MLC (Azure#21814)

Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <[email protected]>

* fixed custom-words conflict (Azure#21829)

* fix custom-words conflict merge (Azure#21830)

* example fix (INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER) (Azure#21832)

Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <[email protected]>

* example fix, use correct api preview version  - (INVALID_REQUEST_PARAMETER) (Azure#21833)

Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <[email protected]>

* Revert breaking change for MLC swagger 2022-12-01-preview (Azure#21885)

Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <[email protected]>

* Revert Connection Category back to enum. (Azure#21939)

* revert provisioning state change (Azure#21940)

* remove body (Azure#21978)

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <[email protected]>

* Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call (Azure#22005)

* Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call

* fix examples for patch - remove body

* fixed formatting

* Ivalbert fix patch2 (Azure#22006)

* Addressed comments, added x-ms-long-running-operation to a patch call

* fix examples for patch - remove body

* fixed formatting

* fixed formatting

* Updated custom words (Azure#22262)

* Fixed prettier errors (Azure#22237)

* fixed examples for LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER check (Azure#22293)

* fixed examples for LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER check (Azure#22294)

* Example fix - OBJECT_MISSING_REQUIRED_PROPERTY - Missing required property: triggerType (Azure#22317)

---------

Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Komal Yadav <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Naman Agarwal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ZhidaLiu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: libc16 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Bingchen Li <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ivaliy Ivanov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants