Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SyncStack - Implement progress tracking that lives close to wire. #29284

Closed
kasobol-msft opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees
Labels
Azure.Core azure-core Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.

Comments

@kasobol-msft
Copy link
Contributor

kasobol-msft commented Jun 7, 2022

Storage has progress tracking functionality that uses Flux.doOnNext to track the number of bytes that have passed through. Two changes are needed

  • Push tracking down to the HTTP client layer so it tracks data sent over the wire, not passed through the SDK layer
  • Support more than just Flux streams, though # 1 should solve this implicitly
@kasobol-msft kasobol-msft added Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Azure.Core azure-core labels Jun 7, 2022
@kasobol-msft kasobol-msft moved this to Planned in Java SDKs Azure Core Jun 7, 2022
@alzimmermsft
Copy link
Member

That has been completed for Reactor Netty but still needs to be looked into for OkHttp, Vertx, and JDK HttpClient.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Planned to Done in Java SDKs Azure Core Feb 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 15, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Azure.Core azure-core Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants