Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip container app sdk generate under RP microsoft.web #31834

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

najian
Copy link
Member

@najian najian commented Dec 11, 2024

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

Tip

Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the Getting help section at the bottom of this PR description.

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

spec_pr_review_workflow_diagram

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!

  • New resource provider.
  • New API version for an existing resource provider. (If API spec is not defined in TypeSpec, the PR should have been created in adherence to OpenAPI specs PR creation guidance).
  • Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
  • Update existing version to fix OpenAPI spec quality issues in S360.
  • Convert existing OpenAPI spec to TypeSpec spec (do not combine this with implementing changes for a new API version).
  • Other, please clarify:
    • To skip generate container app sdk under Microsoft.Web. Microsoft.Web RP already does not support containerapp resource for long time. Container app resource are supported by Microsoft.App RP. It's confusion to generate containerapp resource SDK under Microsoft.Web.

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

  • I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
  • I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
    ARM resource provider contract and
    REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
    I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.

Additional information

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
suppressions guide to get approval.

Getting help

  • First, please carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Please fill out the Purpose of this PR and Due diligence checklist.
  • If you don't have permissions to remove or add labels to the PR, request write access per aka.ms/azsdk/access#request-access-to-rest-api-or-sdk-repositories
  • To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the Next Steps to Merge comment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.
  • For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
    and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
  • For help with ARM review (PR workflow diagram Step 2), see https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
  • If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
    This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
  • If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

@najian najian requested a review from naveedaz as a code owner December 11, 2024 05:24
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ This is the public specs repo main branch which is not intended for iterative development.
    You must acknowledge that you understand that after this PR is merged, you won't be able to stop your changes from being published to Azure customers.
    If this is what you intend, add PublishToCustomers label to your PR.
    Otherwise, retarget this PR onto a feature branch, i.e. with prefix release- (see aka.ms/azsdk/api-versions#release--branches).
  • ❌ The required check named Automated merging requirements met has failed. This is the final check that must pass. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide. In addition, refer to step 4 in the PR workflow diagram

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Generated ApiView

Language Package Name ApiView Link
Go sdk/resourcemanager/appservice/armappservice There is no API change compared with the previous version
Java azure-resourcemanager-appservice-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/a2b80e4fbd144844bca0c504ef8c3337?revisionId=e7049b2145f54766ae819e66e600a21a
JavaScript @azure/arm-appservice https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/98dbdc8147d7472b9bdff567a8b291bc?revisionId=6a0e8d48becd4896a08d601121d58d8e
.Net Azure.ResourceManager.AppService There is no API change compared with the previous version

@mentat9
Copy link
Member

mentat9 commented Dec 13, 2024

@najian - Please fill out all of the onboarding checklists above and add comments or details on "Other" option so reviewers understand what changes you are making. Adding ARMSignedOff label since there are no API changes.

@mentat9 mentat9 added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Dec 13, 2024
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Dec 13, 2024
@mentat9 mentat9 added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Dec 13, 2024
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot added WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required and removed ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review labels Dec 13, 2024
@maririos maririos removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review BreakingChange-Go-Sdk BreakingChange-JavaScript-Sdk ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager Web Apps
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants