-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added FPGA and GPU Node type family for all stable versions #14763
Added FPGA and GPU Node type family for all stable versions #14763
Conversation
Added FPGA and GPU Node type family for all stable versions
Hi, @Sai-Kumar-1901 Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes |
Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models. Location: synapse/common/v1/privateEndpointConnection.json#L326 |
R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes |
Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models. Location: synapse/common/v1/privateEndpointConnection.json#L326 |
R2026 - AvoidAnonymousTypes |
Inline/anonymous models must not be used, instead define a schema with a model name in the 'definitions' section and refer to it. This allows operations to share the models. Location: synapse/common/v1/privateEndpointConnection.json#L326 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'BigDataPools_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Synapse/preview/2021-04-01-preview/bigDataPool.json#L25 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'IpFirewallRules_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Synapse/preview/2021-04-01-preview/firewallRule.json#L203 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'IntegrationRuntimes_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Synapse/preview/2021-04-01-preview/integrationRuntime.json#L85 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'Keys_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Synapse/preview/2021-04-01-preview/keys.json#L75 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'Library_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Synapse/preview/2021-04-01-preview/library.json#L25 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'PrivateEndpointConnections_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Synapse/preview/2021-04-01-preview/privateEndpointConnections.json#L46 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The response of operation:'PrivateLinkResources_Get' is defined without 'systemData'. Consider adding the systemData to the response. Location: Microsoft.Synapse/preview/2021-04-01-preview/privateLinkResources.json#L75 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-04-preview",
"details":"> Installing AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0)"|
|:speech_balloon: AutorestCore/Exception|"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md",
"tag":"package-2021-04-preview",
"details":"> Installed AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/openapi-validator' (1.8.0->1.8.0)"|
The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
Only 10 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.
Rule | Message |
---|---|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-04-preview", "details":"Duplicate Schema named PrivateEndpointConnectionForPrivateLinkHubBasic -- properties.id.$ref: undefined => "#/components/schemas/schemas:1276", properties.id.description: "identifier" =>, properties.id.readOnly: true =>, properties.properties.description: "Properties of private endpoint connection for private link hub" =>, properties.properties.x-ms-client-flatten: true => " |
|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-04-preview", "details":"Schema 'ReplicationLink' has a property 'type' that is already declared the parent schema 'Resource' but isn't significantly different. The property has been removed from ReplicationLink" |
|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-04-preview", "details":"Deduplicating schema name: 'SecurityAlertPolicyName' -> 'SecurityAlertPolicyNameAutoGenerated'" |
|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-04-preview", "details":"Deduplicating schema name: 'PrivateEndpointConnectionForPrivateLinkHubBasic' -> 'PrivateEndpointConnectionForPrivateLinkHubBasicAutoGenerated'" |
|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-03", "details":"Duplicate Schema named PrivateEndpointConnectionForPrivateLinkHubBasic -- properties.id.$ref: undefined => "#/components/schemas/schemas:1275", properties.id.description: "identifier" =>, properties.id.readOnly: true =>, properties.properties.description: "Properties of private endpoint connection for private link hub" =>, properties.properties.x-ms-client-flatten: true => " |
|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-03", "details":"Schema 'ReplicationLink' has a property 'type' that is already declared the parent schema 'Resource' but isn't significantly different. The property has been removed from ReplicationLink" |
|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-03", "details":"Deduplicating schema name: 'SecurityAlertPolicyName' -> 'SecurityAlertPolicyNameAutoGenerated'" |
|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2021-03", "details":"Deduplicating schema name: 'PrivateEndpointConnectionForPrivateLinkHubBasic' -> 'PrivateEndpointConnectionForPrivateLinkHubBasicAutoGenerated'" |
|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12-01", "details":"Duplicate Schema named PrivateEndpointConnectionForPrivateLinkHubBasic -- properties.id.$ref: undefined => "#/components/schemas/schemas:1273", properties.id.description: "identifier" =>, properties.id.readOnly: true =>, properties.properties.description: "Properties of private endpoint connection for private link hub" =>, properties.properties.x-ms-client-flatten: true => " |
|
"readme":"synapse/resource-manager/readme.md", "tag":"package-2020-12-01", "details":"Schema 'ReplicationLink' has a property 'type' that is already declared the parent schema 'Resource' but isn't significantly different. The property has been removed from ReplicationLink" |
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
Please also make changes to 2021-04-01-preview and 2021-05-01. Going forward, we will generate SDKs based on these two API versions. |
Have made changes in 2021-04-01-preview. This change was already part of 2021-05-01. |
@PhoenixHe-msft could you please help merge the PR? Thanks in advance! |
) * Added FPGA and GPU Node type family for all stable versions Added FPGA and GPU Node type family for all stable versions * adding node size family for 2021-04-01-preview Co-authored-by: Sai-Kumar-1901 <[email protected]>
) * Added FPGA and GPU Node type family for all stable versions Added FPGA and GPU Node type family for all stable versions * adding node size family for 2021-04-01-preview Co-authored-by: Sai-Kumar-1901 <[email protected]>
Added FPGA and GPU Node type family for all stable versions
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Please ensure to add changelog with this PR by answering the following questions.
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.
Please ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.