Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSS Not Appropriate for Injected Page Layout Code #14

Open
jacobjohnston opened this issue Nov 2, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

CSS Not Appropriate for Injected Page Layout Code #14

jacobjohnston opened this issue Nov 2, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@jacobjohnston
Copy link

Please provide us with the following information:

This issue is for a: (mark with an x)

- [ ] bug report -> please search issues before submitting
- [ ] feature request
- [ ] documentation issue or request
- [x] regression (a behavior that used to work and stopped in a new release)

Minimal steps to reproduce

1.) Use this template for the latest Page Layout version (2.1.0)
2.) Observe that many elements are not styled appropriately.

Any log messages given by the failure

N/A

Expected/desired behavior

The CSS from this repository to render all elements the same way using the built-in templates do.

OS and Version?

N/A

Versions

Azure Page Layout

Mention any other details that might be useful

I've found that a number of the element IDs have changed in a way where they no longer to work with this template. For example, #email_ver_but_send now appears to be #emailVerificationControl_but_send_code, #logonIdentifier or #signInName now appears to be , #email. This repository should be updated when the page layout versions change.

@ckjacksoncda
Copy link

Yep! I can also confirm this. Cost me a few handfuls of hair. lol

@cmaneiro
Copy link

I'm seeing the same issue in the unified page, I have solve it adding .unified_container .row .panel-default #api .localAccount .entry .entry-item input to the unified.css file Line 109.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants