Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use primitives.wasm where possible instead of aztec3-circuits.wasm #180

Closed
spalladino opened this issue Apr 5, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #238
Closed

Use primitives.wasm where possible instead of aztec3-circuits.wasm #180

spalladino opened this issue Apr 5, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #238
Assignees
Labels
T-optimisation Type: Optimisation. Making something faster / cheaper / smaller

Comments

@spalladino
Copy link
Collaborator

We have set up a smaller wasm file that contains only barretenberg cryptographic primitives (see here). Projects that need access to them but not to the full a3 circuits should rely on that wasm to reduce package size.

@spalladino spalladino self-assigned this Apr 6, 2023
@spalladino spalladino added this to A3 Apr 6, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Todo in A3 Apr 6, 2023
@iAmMichaelConnor iAmMichaelConnor added the T-optimisation Type: Optimisation. Making something faster / cheaper / smaller label Apr 8, 2023
@spalladino spalladino moved this from Todo to In Review in A3 Apr 10, 2023
@spalladino spalladino moved this from In Review to Todo in A3 Apr 10, 2023
@spalladino spalladino assigned spalladino and unassigned spalladino Apr 10, 2023
@spalladino spalladino moved this from Todo to In Progress in A3 Apr 11, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in A3 Apr 11, 2023
@iAmMichaelConnor iAmMichaelConnor removed this from A3 Jul 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
T-optimisation Type: Optimisation. Making something faster / cheaper / smaller
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants