Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(proto): replace deprecated bufls with buf_ls #1275

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

imsakg
Copy link
Contributor

@imsakg imsakg commented Nov 23, 2024

Update language server references from bufls to buf_ls as bufls is deprecated and will be removed in lspconfig 0.2.1.

Update language server references from `bufls` to `buf_ls` as `bufls`
is deprecated and will be removed in lspconfig 0.2.1.
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 23, 2024

Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:

Proper conventional commit scoping:

  • If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin

  • If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error

  • Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above

  • README is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url> unless they are inside a [title](url)

  • Entry returns a single plugin spec with the new plugin as the only top level spec (not applicable for recipes or packs).

  • Proper usage of opts table rather than setting things up with the config function.

  • Proper usage of specs table for all specs that are not dependencies of a given plugin (not applicable for recipes or packs).

@Uzaaft Uzaaft merged commit bb7988a into AstroNvim:main Nov 23, 2024
17 checks passed
@Galex88

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Uzaaft

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Galex88

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Galex88

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@Uzaaft
Copy link
Member

Uzaaft commented Dec 4, 2024

marking them as offtopic then

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants