fix(codesnap-nvim): Add default saving path

[Std-Enigma]

Closes #1120

[github-actions]

Review Checklist

Does this PR follow the [Contribution Guidelines](development guidelines)? Following is a partial checklist:

Proper conventional commit scoping:

• If you are adding a new plugin, the scope would be the name of the category it is being added into. ex. feat(utility): added noice.nvim plugin

• If you are modifying a pre-existing plugin or pack, the scope would be the name of the plugin folder. ex. fix(noice-nvim): fix LSP handler error

• Pull request title has the appropriate conventional commit type and scope where the scope is the name of the pre-existing directory in the project as described above

• README is properly formatted and uses fenced in links with <url> unless they are inside a [title](url)

• Entry returns a single plugin spec with the new plugin as the only top level spec (not applicable for recipes or packs).

• Proper usage of opts table rather than setting things up with the config function.

• Proper usage of specs table for all specs that are not dependencies of a given plugin (not applicable for recipes or packs).

[Uzaaft]

Hold off on merging this, I’m gonna try and upstream something instead

[Uzaaft]

mistricky/codesnap.nvim#124 This will make this redundant

[Uzaaft]

Re-opened since the maintainer is slow to merge, which is fair enough. Let's get this merged and then we'll revert the changes whenever the upstream PR is merged.