You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 28, 2023. It is now read-only.
[Questions]
Both TestCases run Staking transaction with over amount.
How to decide a final amount of staking value, when the value is set to a value more than the amount of Transferable.
I guess based on two TestCases that the network(Node) processes the value of oversetting to {Transferable-1}.
Can I convince that upper-guess is true?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I want to confirm the internal staking logic.
I found some issue for staking by using polkadot.js.
[ENVIROMENTS]
TestCase01)
Network : SHIBUYA testnet
Before Test - Account State: Transferable(65.130xxxSBY) | Staking(15SBY) | Unstaking(5SBY)
Test Transaction : dAppStaking("Evm": "0x772d8eecb77545feb8d19f7649f6be942bfd1cf9", Amount 80SBY)
After Test - Staking Transaction Success / Account State: Transferable(1SBY) | Staking(74.130SBY) | Unstaking(5SBY)
https://shibuya.subscan.io/extrinsic/0x478908544239cc56626cf1cb1717b288e1e4d6b39aab1a11c791494d6317e386
TestCase02)
Network : ASTAR mainnet
Before Test - Account State: Transferable(603.194xxxASTR) | Staking(0ASTR) | Unstaking(502ASTR)
!!Test Transaction : dAppStaking("Evm": "0x48f292e9fdce07ba34217b0aa62e08b62376df3e", Amount 1104.220xxxASTR)
!!After Test - Staking Transaction Success / Account State: Transferable(1ASTR) | Staking(602.194xxxASTR) | Unstaking(502ASTR)
https://astar.subscan.io/extrinsic/0x8663d8fbccf989aec329df725c0e1e2ad2ac2fc99a780576004f7b49b56bd903
[Questions]
Both TestCases run Staking transaction with over amount.
I guess based on two TestCases that the network(Node) processes the value of oversetting to {Transferable-1}.
Can I convince that upper-guess is true?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: