Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

re-evaluation #16

Open
franciscorichter opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

re-evaluation #16

franciscorichter opened this issue May 24, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@franciscorichter
Copy link

Hello,
Thanks so much for this package, it has been quite useful to me. But I am optimising a random function so I really need re-evaluation at every step. In the reference paper of 2011 says that this is possible with checkWinner , but this option is not anymore and previous versions of the package are not working properly in my computer either. Is there any way to get that functionality back?

Regards,
Francisco.
@k-m-m
Copy link
Collaborator

k-m-m commented Nov 6, 2022

In the NEWS file, I see ---
Changes in version 2.2-0
o checkWinner and avWinner options have been removed. If the user desires
averaging (to deal with a stochastic objective function) then a wrapper
function may be used to give the average value over several calls.

Would using a wrapper function that takes the average or best of several calls of your random function work for your needs?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@k-m-m @franciscorichter