confirmed-bug
: Bugs you have verifieddiscuss
: Things that need larger discussionfeature request
: Any issue that requests a new featuregood first issue
: Issues suitable for newcomers to fixmeta
: Governance, policies, procedures, etc.tsc-agenda
: Open issues and pull requests with this label will be added to the Technical Steering Committee meeting agenda
author-ready
- A pull request is author ready when:- There is a CI run in progress or completed.
- There is at least one Collaborator approval (or two TSC approvals for semver-major PRs).
- There are no outstanding review comments.
Please always add the author ready
label to pull requests that qualify.
Please always remove it again as soon as the conditions are not met anymore,
such as if the CI run fails or a new outstanding review comment is posted.
semver-{minor,major}
- be conservative – that is, if a change has the remote chance of breaking something, go for semver-major
- when adding a semver label, add a comment explaining why you're adding it
- minor vs. patch: roughly: "does it add a new method / does it add a new section to the docs"
- major vs. everything else: run last versions tests against this version, if they pass, probably minor or patch
We use labels to keep track of which branches a commit should land on:
dont-land-on-v?.x
- For changes that do not apply to a certain release line
- Also used when the work of backporting a change outweighs the benefits
land-on-v?.x
- Used by releasers to mark a PR as scheduled for inclusion in an LTS release
- Applied to the original PR for clean cherry-picks, to the backport PR otherwise
backport-requested-v?.x
- Used to indicate that a PR needs a manual backport to a branch in order to land the changes on that branch
- Typically applied by a releaser when the PR does not apply cleanly or it breaks the tests after applying
- Will be replaced by either
dont-land-on-v?.x
orbackported-to-v?.x
backported-to-v?.x
- Applied to PRs for which a backport PR has been merged
lts-watch-v?.x
- Applied to PRs which the LTS working group should consider including in a LTS release
- Does not indicate that any specific action will be taken, but can be effective as messaging to non-collaborators
lts-agenda
- For things that need discussion by the LTS working group
- (for example semver-minor changes that need or should go into an LTS release)
v?.x
- Automatically applied to changes that do not target
master
but rather thev?.x-staging
branch
- Automatically applied to changes that do not target
Once a release line enters maintenance mode, the corresponding labels do not need to be attached anymore, as only important bugfixes will be included.
- Operating system labels
macos
,windows
,smartos
,aix
- No
linux
label because it is the implied default
- Architecture labels
arm
,mips
,s390
,ppc
- No
x86{_64}
label because it is the implied default