Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

invalid mtu #296

Open
qatar2030 opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

invalid mtu #296

qatar2030 opened this issue May 27, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@qatar2030
Copy link

1
2
3
4

What is the causing for that?

@lehoangnb
Copy link

Set pppoe-out mtu to 1492 or 1480, 1460 maybe wrong value for pppoe

@Anime4000
Copy link
Owner

@qatar2030
Copy link
Author

i'm still sufring

@ToTheCLI
Copy link

ToTheCLI commented May 28, 2024

i'm still sufring

Did you disable IPv6?
From PPP --- Profile set Use IPv6 to No

@longthanhtran
Copy link

Looks like your pppoe-client caps at 1460 but you can try with standard 1492 to see if the actual MTU is accepted. There cases where ISPs support baby jumbo frame then you need to set your sfp1plus interface with MTU of 1508 and set your pppoe-client with 1500 to enjoy full MTU 1500.

@Anime4000
Copy link
Owner

I did the baby jumbo 1508, somehow ISP use VRRP for PPPoE and lose ability to have 1500 PPPoE MTU, but now only MTU is 1500 is Down Stream path

Screenshot_20240603_113027_MikroTik.jpg

@longthanhtran
Copy link

When I look routeros pppoe client help, it apprears that when you don't specify the MTU value, its default value is 1460.

The log entries that show the warning is when a client from your internal network try to send packets with MTU 1492 which is larger than gateway MTU then you have fragmentation issue.

Try to use a default MTU 1492 at least to see if it resolves the issue first.

One more thing, as you use VLAN interface in routeros while the sfp can tag VLAN for you, try the option and let your pppoe-client dials on sfp1plus interface.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants