Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some issues after decompiling #93

Open
DREAMERA000 opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Some issues after decompiling #93

DREAMERA000 opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
uncompliant Not comply with our terms

Comments

@DREAMERA000
Copy link

DREAMERA000 commented Mar 22, 2023

Thanks for all you hard work,it's a really nice tool!

But I found some issues when I ran jsxer with this file:
EXTERNAL REFERENCE REMOVED BY ADMIN

When I use the compiled version (jsxbin) directly , this file works well in AE.But after decompiling,it apprears some issues.

There are at last two issues(I tried to fix all the bugs, but it was hard. So only two have been found):

  • Some illegal words “class” come out after decompiling;
  • A function appear wrong content"()" at the end(after "{}").

Could you please try decompiling this file and check it out? Thank you all very much!

@psyirius
Copy link
Collaborator

psyirius commented Mar 27, 2023

Disclaimer:

This tool might not emit a drop in replacement `jsx` for the compiled `jsxbin` you fed it with (at least, not yet).
It's developed mainly focused on source code recovery and running security inspections.
It's not developed to process commercial plugins/products.
Plus, Open source != Free products.
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!

But, we strictly don't encourage to use it on commercial products or doing it unethically or piracy.

I have to close this issue due to reference to a commercial script.
Kindly, consider reopening this issue with a reproducible example which doesn't bring any objections.
Thank you for the Issue! btw.

@psyirius psyirius self-assigned this Mar 27, 2023
@psyirius
Copy link
Collaborator

Usage of Commercial Product for issue reference.

@psyirius psyirius added the uncompliant Not comply with our terms label Mar 27, 2023
@psyirius
Copy link
Collaborator

psyirius commented Mar 27, 2023

But a little clarification feedback on this issue

  1. I don't see any. class is not a keyword in ES3.
  2. () followed by a function's body is an IIFE.

@AngeloD2022
Copy link
Owner

reopening this for #96

@AngeloD2022 AngeloD2022 reopened this Mar 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
uncompliant Not comply with our terms
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants