Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

revamp loadgen #117

Open
turadg opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

revamp loadgen #117

turadg opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
@usmanmani1122
Labels
needs-design SRE Items requiring attention of SRE team

Comments

@turadg
Copy link
Member

turadg commented Jul 11, 2024

Problem to be solved

This repo has a number of open issues and we haven't prioritized fixing them because we expect to replace this tool with one or more others.

Draft design

needs work

  • How will we test multi-node chain?
  • How will we test state-sync?
@mhofman
Copy link
Member

mhofman commented Jul 11, 2024

The deployment-test of agoric-sdk also has some customization meant to trigger more aggressively any execution divergence: it compiles xsnap with XSNAP_RANDOM_INIT which causes uninitialized memory in xsnap to not be zero filled. That results in diverging heap snapshots if there is any uninitialized memory. It's possible a more dedicated test could be used instead.

@turadg turadg mentioned this issue Nov 15, 2024
Merged
@aj-agoric aj-agoric assigned usmanmani1122 and unassigned toliaqat Dec 18, 2024
@Muneeb147 Muneeb147 changed the title replace loadgen revamp loadgen Jan 2, 2025
@aj-agoric aj-agoric added the SRE Items requiring attention of SRE team label Feb 11, 2025
@mhofman
Copy link
Member

mhofman commented Feb 13, 2025

Related:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@usmanmani1122 usmanmani1122

Labels
needs-design SRE Items requiring attention of SRE team
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@turadg @mhofman @toliaqat @usmanmani1122 @aj-agoric