-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Treasury emergency shutdown option #3092
Comments
@rowgraus This does not have an area label that is covered by our weekly tech / planning meetings. Can you assign the proper label? We cover: agd, agoric-cosmos, amm, core economy, cosmic-swingset, endo, getrun, governance, installation-bundling, metering, run-protocol, staking, swingset, swingset-runner, token economy, ui, wallet, zoe, zoe contract |
@rowgraus Bump. For proper project planning and tracking, this needs an area label covered by one of our weekly planning meetings. Please pick the appropriate one from: agd, agoric-cli, agoric-cosmos, amm, core economy, cosmic-swingset, endo, ertp, getrun, governance, installation-bundling, metering, oracle, pegasus, run-protocol, ses, staking, swingset, swingset-runner, tc39, token economy, tooling, ui, wallet, xsnap, zoe, zoe contract |
#4536 is for pausing while we fix something, with the intention that we then resume with minimal disruption. The description above sounds more like a bankruptcy proceeding as part of permanently terminating operations. Am I misunderstanding? |
This is replaced by #4536. |
MakerDAO has an emergency shutdown capability which can be triggered by governance. We have discussed the need for such a mechanism. This ticket should organize initial thoughts on how an emergency shutdown should be initiated.
Design considerations:
Maker's approach is the following:
Step 1: Governance triggers the emergency shutdown module which locks oracle prices and stops additional vault operations among other things
Step 2: Vault owners may withdraw excess collateral from their vaults
Step 3: DAI owners may redeem DAI for pro-rata shares of remaining collateral. If the system is net undercollateralized after Step 2, DAI owners won't receive a full $1 worth of collateral. If there is a remaining surplus from previous Maker operations, DAI owners may receive more than $1 worth of collateral
Challenges with this approach:
@dtribble @btulloh for discussion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: