You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Possibly out of scope for this PR, but I notice the DEM geotiff comes out with a pixel size of 80m/40m for 20x4/10x2 looks, even though we originally downsample the input DEM to 160m/80m. I looks like that's because we set oversampling to 2 when calling GC_map_mod and gc_map, which resamples the DEM back to 80m/40m: https://github.com/ASFHyP3/hyp3-lib/blob/develop/hyp3lib/SLC_copy_S1_fullSW.py#L63
That seems unproductive? Should we resample the input DEM to 80m/40m at the start and avoid possibly throwing away resolution?
Possibly out of scope for this PR, but I notice the DEM geotiff comes out with a pixel size of 80m/40m for 20x4/10x2 looks, even though we originally downsample the input DEM to 160m/80m. I looks like that's because we set oversampling to
2
when callingGC_map_mod
andgc_map
, which resamples the DEM back to 80m/40m:https://github.com/ASFHyP3/hyp3-lib/blob/develop/hyp3lib/SLC_copy_S1_fullSW.py#L63
That seems unproductive? Should we resample the input DEM to 80m/40m at the start and avoid possibly throwing away resolution?
Originally posted by @asjohnston-asf in #247 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: