Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: change type of onDereference to non-required #299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2023

Conversation

jonluca
Copy link
Collaborator

@jonluca jonluca commented Jan 20, 2023

The type of onDereference is required, which breaks types in some downstream packages. The code also checks for its existence on L72 of dereference.js so this is fine.

@jonluca
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jonluca commented Jan 20, 2023

Also @philsturgeon I'm happy to takeover this project. I was meaning to rewrite in typescript one of these days anyways

@bcherny
Copy link
Contributor

bcherny commented Jan 21, 2023

This change looks good to me!

@philsturgeon
Copy link
Member

@jonluca thank you for the fix and the offer! I’ve added you as a maintainer as well as @jamesmoschou, so the two of you could share responsibilities and review each other’s work. I’ll be around if you need anything, same username on most of the socials.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3972085564

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-4.8%) to 90.943%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3970873546: -4.8%
Covered Lines: 750
Relevant Lines: 787

💛 - Coveralls

@philsturgeon philsturgeon merged commit 12cb26a into APIDevTools:main Jan 23, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 10.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants