You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't think the NMOS specs discuss differences between HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/1.0, or indicate a recommendation either way?
However, the fact that the test suite's Registries are currently HTTP/1.0 identified a bug in the HTTP implementation of cpprestsdk, which means it doesn't properly handle HTTP/1.0 servers that don't do "Connection: Keep-Alive". (Fix available at microsoft/cpprestsdk#1032.)
So, I'm not opposed to the test suite testing HTTP/1.0... but did it ought at least check HTTP/1.1 as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fwiw I had a try replacing the basic Flask web server with Werkzeug (which as noted it at least partially uses anyway). Unfortunately this still returned an HTTP/1.0 response.
I'm wondering if it might be necessary to provide instructions for use with a full WSGI compatible web server in order to achieve this (for example https://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/WSGIquickstart.html#deploying-flask). I've not seen anything concrete, but running the 'development' web server may only be capable of HTTP/1.0
I don't think the NMOS specs discuss differences between HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/1.0, or indicate a recommendation either way?
However, the fact that the test suite's Registries are currently HTTP/1.0 identified a bug in the HTTP implementation of cpprestsdk, which means it doesn't properly handle HTTP/1.0 servers that don't do
"Connection: Keep-Alive"
. (Fix available at microsoft/cpprestsdk#1032.)So, I'm not opposed to the test suite testing HTTP/1.0... but did it ought at least check HTTP/1.1 as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: