Equality v. Market should be more accurate

[ArmandRoetz]

What I mean by the title is that even thou I favor equality as a high priority. I favor the support of markets more, and ensuring that the economy is more productive that I do about the equality of wealth and resources amongst citizens. Degulations of markets and allowing corporations to have more freedom to pursue own goals is more important than providing for those less fortunate; it might sound harsh but it is often the most efficient way of improving lives. Markets success might not ensure that everyone has limo's but it makes sure everyone is feed.
So please try and improve this situation for more accurate result. I am happy with the other sections and think that they are highly accurate.

[Genora51]

What result did you get on the economic axis? It sounds from what you are describing that you should score towards the “Market” side more than the “Equality” side, was that not the case?

[bedro0]

I second to this. The test obviously weighs socialist-related responses more than capitalist ones. I consider myself to be more right-leaning when it comes to economics, but the result gave me 66-social 33-markets.

[papel]

"Market" isn't a value by itself. "Market" should be renamed to "Efficiency", "Productivity" or "Meritocracy".