-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More thorough automated dask testing #771
Comments
What about looking for some end result in the notebook that assures us the scheduler and the worked pods were created and worked as expected? Would not be that an easier test to write, perhaps? |
This is Pangeo's current testing infrastructure: https://github.com/pangeo-data/pangeo-cloud-federation/blob/staging/test.py https://github.com/pangeo-data/pangeo-cloud-federation/blob/staging/run_tests.sh |
We already have the machinery to run tests so I guess it is a matter to include/adapt test.py into a test notebook, maybe? |
Yep. I'll look into it once I've babysat the Auth0 stuff :) |
Description
We wanted to make sure that the options listed in the following docs were all working on the Pangeo deployment before we go live with the prod hub: https://pangeo.io/cloud.html#dask Since these are quite generic tests of dask (e.g. don't require requester pays access to data, etc), it would be nice to add them to our daskhub tests so we can verify the scaling of all our daskhubs and be alerted to any issues. Our current test only tests local dask right now.
Value / benefit
Implementation details
I would expect there to be a check that the dask scheduler and worker pods were correctly created in the namespace and I'm not sure how to write that test
Tasks to complete
No response
Updates
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: